Much of what we know about charitable planning comes from
living people. They tell us in surveys that they’ve included a bequest in their
will, or established some type of life income gift. But we also know that some
people simply won't disclose about their giving, and, for some others, social desirability bias
leads some to exaggerate their philanthropy. After our survey subjects have
died, it’s difficult to compare their reports with actual behavior, especially
for estates that fall below the estate tax threshold. There are various formulas
for estimating the number of Americans who make charitable bequests, but the
truth is, we don’t know exactly how many do.
Image courtesty of Ambro / FreeDigitalPhotos.net |
“We’ve all talked about testamentary provisions, and tried
to figure out how many of our donors have charitable plans,” Jackie says, “but
this is a statistically-valid tracking of what people said they would do and what they
actually did—and how they did it.” In addition
to the HRS data, Jackie and Russell will also analyze more than 1,000 charitable
trusts managed by BNY Mellon Wealth Management, to learn about the donors and their strategies
for directing assets to charity.
It’s tantalizing to consider what all of this data will
reveal about planned gift donors as a national group. How might it apply to one
planner’s work? In some cases, the national HRS data confirms what planners
observe in their own experience. For example, charitable provisions actually are most likely to be added or dropped
when a donor’s family structure changes (e.g., through marriage, widowhood, or
the birth of a grandchild), or as time or events increase a donors’ sense of
her own mortality. “Plans are largely stagnant across
time,” Russell says, “but then are highly likely to change dramatically during
a punctuating event, the strongest of which is actually approaching the date of
death.”
He also notes that in
many donors’ plans, a will is only a "backup" document. It
doesn't control assets with transfer-on-death (TOD) designations or most
jointly held assets and accounts. “Over the last few decades, TOD
designations have expanded dramatically and can now transfer the entire estate
including, in some states, real estate. ..We are seeing a lot of charitable plans
that are part of a signed and executed will where the will exists after death,
but is never probated.” In connection with this, Russell says
that the relative strength of a living trust in actually generating a
post-mortem charitable transfer was “dramatic.” The HRS findings show a
gradual decrease in the usage of wills and increased usage of living trusts.
What donors actually did, and how they did it, informs what
charities expect to receive, and when to expect it. What trends have you observed in your planned
gift donors and their methods of giving? What information would you like to get
from the HRS data? Jackie and Russell will consider your comments as they
prepare their presentation to the National Conference on Philanthropic
Planning.
Trending Forward: Emerging Demographics Driving Planned Giving
Thursday, October 17
8:30-9:30 a.m.
Find out more about Jackie Franey and Russell James and download the mobile app.
More resources from Jackie Franey and Russell James
Thursday, October 17
8:30-9:30 a.m.
Find out more about Jackie Franey and Russell James and download the mobile app.
More resources from Jackie Franey and Russell James
Charitable Bequest Decision-Making: Practical Lessons from Research Findings (Russell James, slides)
Charitable Bequest Demographics (Russell James, slides)
Miningfor Gold: Sifting the Database to Strike it Rich (Jackie Franey; Anita Lawson,
2008 National Conference on Planned Giving)
Bleak the New Black? Motivating Donors in the New Normal (Jackie Franey and Sally Rubin, 2012
National Conference on Philanthropic Planning)About Barbara Yeager
No comments:
Post a Comment